In this interview Misha Mansoor of band Periphery discusses the notion of "what is the best (guitar)", and how it doesn't make sense to get into that mindset.
I'm always asked "who is the best, what is the best", etc.. Same answer: there is no "best", only what you like. Learning not only what you like, but why you like it is part of the experience of the lost art of music appreciation.
What I like about Mansoor's answer is that he references the precept that it takes time, and it's something each person has to do as individuals as part of the process. Even if I though I knew what/who was "the best", me simply telling you the answer wouldn't give you any knew information. In fact, it would do the reverse: it would make you try to evaluate what you do relative to what is in your experience an abstraction.
I might be able to elaborate on my answer very specifically. But at some juncture there would be a breakdown between my explanation and your comprehension. Because of one of two things: either I would use a reference or term that you previously were not aware of, or if it stayed within your sphere of comprehension, there would have to be something I weight more heavily than you. Because otherwise, you would have already come to the same conclusion!
Hence, as a music teacher I can help someone gain the mental tools to more concisely grasp the above abstraction, but it's not as easy as just giving one answer. As Mansoor alludes, because music is such a vast and tenuous thing, seeking precise, empirical parameters is a fallacy.
You can have complete and strong beliefs regarding what/who you like in something that is art, but that is not the same as knowing what/who is "the best". It's art, not basketball.
At 38:08:
No comments:
Post a Comment